Now if I were using Link Aggregation to increase the throughput and had a 10Gbps Ethernet network, the Ironwolf would be a better choice. But for now, I am very happy with my WD REDs. Reliability – Tie It is 5.79 x 4 x 10.3 inches and weighs 1.66 pounds. WD Red has a slower rotation speed than Seagate IronWolf so you can't transfer files as quickly. Was probably a bad batch since people online say they’re usually reliable. Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. I recently had a 4TB IronWolf totally die within a few weeks of commisioning, and it was replaced by the store. Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD Red Plus 4TB. Join 131 other VueVille fans! Gerade in NAS-Systemen ist der Energiebedarf ein wichtiger Punkt, denn über eine Laufzeit von mehreren Jahren und ggf. Anti-vibration sensors against vibrations. WD Gold 12TB (WD121KRYZ) I know that all three of them work at 7200rpm, they have 256MB of cache and 5 years warranty. Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster.. WD red or seagate ironwolf which is the better drive. By placing special NAS hard drives, you can make sure that all your backups, movies, photos, and personal files are safe. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. The RED hard drives could easily max that out, so I had nothing to gain by going for the Ironwolf. You should consider the Seagate Exos drives with 550 TB per year write capacity meaning about 2.5 petabytes during the warranty period. Both would probably be acceptable to me, given the same cost and that Ironwolfs have slightly better performance … This content is provided ‘as is’ and is subject to change or removal at any time. Members; 20 134 posts; Share; Posted September 11, 2019. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Receive the best promotions and personal advice. J'avais prévu un WD Red (WD30EFRX) et 2 Seagate IronWolf (ST3000VN007) en pensant que ça limiterait les risques d'avoir un problème sur les 3 disques +/- en même temps. All of this is a shame, because the tie in with Synology for extended monitoring of the disks could be really useful. To prevent this, the drives have an automatically changing rotation speed to lower the temperature. Capable of running at a fast 7,200rpm … In fact, the worst of the HGSTs have been much better than the best of the other brands in the vast majority of cases. Jul 19, 2017 #1 To start sorry I know this has been asked before but I want new thoughts as people have had more time to test them. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. Since these drives are not your regular desktop disks, it is essential to understand its use. Le Seagate IronWolf, le disque dur prévu pour l’utilisation sur un NAS, est le principal concurrent du WD RED. Find your answer quickly and easily on our Customer Service page. I have been using WD RED drives in my QNAP TS-253A and can confirm that these drives are super quiet. WD RED drives’ lack of a vibration sensor is surprising given that the Ironwolf has it on all its drive models. Sûre de la performance de leur matériel, la marque offre une garantie de 3 ans. The Ironwolf runs at higher RPMs compared to the WD RED, so its no surprise that the Ironwolf is also louder on average than the WD RED drives. Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster. Variable hard drive speed for energy conservation. I bought 5 4TB WD Red all at once and they have all failed within 3 years. And many users will compare the two brands when choosing a storage device such as SSD, HDD. WD RED vs Seagate NAS. The black and green design helps to identify the series. By jmassaro87, September 11, 2019 in Hardware. We'll explain the differences and similarities between these hard drives. Schreibend sind fast 700 MB/s möglich, hier hat ein RAID 5 aber auch einen Vorteil gegenüber dem anderen RAID 6 Verbund, da die Dateien auf weniger Festplatten aufgeteilt werden müssen. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. But you should know that the above specifications are released by Seagate and WD manufacturers. Seagate vs Western Digital HDD Testing the WD Red 4TB SMR WD40EFAX Drive. Ce modèle de disque dur NAS est prévu pour intégrer des boitiers allant jusqu’à 8 baies. Lost your data or is your drive malfunctioning? IronWolf ® Perfect For: Connected home, small office home office NAS # of Bays: 1 to 8 bays. You can't beat that drive. The IronWolf scored 2,969, where the WD Red 10TB managed 3,011. Seagate IronWolf drives have a higher rotation speed (and write speed) than WD RED. When I was choosing the hard drives for my DIY NAS NVR system, I did a ton of research. Since these drives are not your regular desktop disks, it is essential to understand its use. WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf : Before we delve into the detailed specs of each, let us clarify the basics. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. 1 year ago. Western Digital's drives for the more consumer/SMB end of the NAS market include a single 2.5 inch model at 1TB, and a variety of sizes for more standard 3.5 inch drives. WD Red Pro 10TB (WD101KFBX) 3. Independent testing by other publications such as Hardware.info have also shown that the Ironwolf drives are much faster than the WD RED drives. Both Seagate and WD have a NAS hard drive, namely the Seagate IronWolf and the WD Red. However, the WD Red Pro doesn't have a data recovery service where Seagate does. The same thing has happened with WD Reds. Ceci dit, il faut que le disque soit conçu pour être réactif en permanence et durant des jours sans répit. Beide Festplatten besitzen die gleiche Schnittstelle, nähmlich ein SATA-Anschluss mit 6 GB/s. Western Digital 6TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 256 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD6003FFBX. Write and read had removal as soon as you stop using the NAS. Are these basic WD Red (SMR) drives, or Red Plus (CMR)? Le Seagate IronWolf est clairement l'un des meilleurs HDD pour NAS. By tucansam, July ... WD and Seagate have not fared nearly as well. We had two main areas of testing. Capacity: 12 TB, 10 TB, 8 TB, 6 TB, 4 TB, 3 TB, 2 TB, 1 TB. … Planning to buy one of these models. This means you'll have a better RAID array, error correction, and more. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Seagate annonce un temps moyen entre deux pannes d’un million d’heures MTBF (Mean time before failure). Seagate IronWolf (10TB, 7,200RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Our throughput test measures the 4k random performance. Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD Red Plus 4TB. I've been upgrading to larger size WD … 4.6 out of 5 stars 1,366. Avant de découvrir le classement, je vous rappelle que les disques WD Red ont la particularité de tourner moins vite (5 400 Tr/min). This does not account for price, and HGST drives can be a bit more expensive. Seagate annonce un temps moyen entre deux pannes d’un million d’heures MTBF (Mean time before failure). Seagate Barracuda. หมวดหมู่: บทความของฉัน . SMR drives for NAS workloads (even consumer workloads) is not proven yet, end users and their data should wait for vendors to get the technology right for the use-case. Although do note the sample size is much larger in Seagate’s case for most drive sizes, generally the higher the sample size, the more accurate the data becomes. Check out my self-hosted DIY CCTV setup and DIY Smart Home. So today, I will show you the differences of Seagate vs Western Digital on storage devices. European Hardware Association’s 2× winner for Best Hard Drive. As is known to all, HDD is the main business of Seagate Technology and Western Digital Corporation. Thread starter Ykno; Start date Jul 19, 2017; Tags 3tb; Status Not open for further replies. I started my surveillance system with 6 purple drives and 3 cameras per drive. Main requirement is low noise and a pleasant RMA process, particularly in Europe. IronWolf drives >= 8TB are 7200rpm. After purchasing a WD 4TB Red EFAX drive like the one that Servethehome tested, we used our existing test rig with eight Seagate Ironwolf drives … Seagate IronWolf 10 To (ST10000VN0008) Western Digital WD Red 14 To SATA 6Gb/s. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. Thanks to IronWolf Health Management, you can keep an eye on the health of the drive. Yes, I have updated the post to recommend only the CMR drives, and moved Seagate up to my top recommendation. Dans ce cas d'usage, recommanderiez-vous plutôt un WD Red ou un Seagate Ironwolf ? Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster. Also happened to me with Seagate drives a while back. IME IronWolf 4TB drives run cooler than older WD Red 3TB drives. This makes your hard drives warmer than usual. The Winner Is- A Tie. WD Red has a slower rotation speed than Seagate IronWolf so you can't transfer files as quickly. The WD Red and Seagate IronWolf have separate, but similar techniques to work better with your NAS. Click the button below and set a password via email to log in. From the above chart about WD Red vs Seagate IronWolf specifications, you can easily know which NAS hard is better for you. WD, Seagate, HGST, Toshiba noise level comparison. Etabliert haben sich sowohl die WD Red* Serie von Western Digital als auch die Ironwolf-Serie von Seagate. 75 comments. Tag: WD Red or Seagate Ironwolf Best NAS Hard Drives of 2019 What is the Best NAS hard drive of 2019 When choosing your first NAS device, as important as it seems to get the right network attached storage device, even more important is making sure you get the right hard drive or SSD Media to … Expect to pay: $100-$800. Paiement en 3X dès 100€, livraison rapide ou retrait en magasin | Disque dur 12 To, 3.5", SATA/AHCI, 7200 tr/min, 256 Mo, ST12000VN0007. Qnap TVS-1282 i7 (32GB RAM) 8x10TB WD White - Raid 6, 2x M.2 Crucial 500gb (Raid1 VM), 2x SSD EVO 500gb (Raid1 QTS), 2x SSD EVO 250gb (Raid1 Cache), 2x M.2 PCIe Intel 512GB NVME (Raid1-Servers) Synology -1817+ - 2x10,2x8,2x6 (Ironwolf) 2x6 (WD Red) - SHR Drobo 5n -3x2TB WD Green, 2x3TB WD Red - Drobo Raid ProBox 8 Bay USB3 - 8x4TB Seagate - JBOD Seagate IronWolf 2TB vs WD Red 2TB. WD Gold 12TB (WD121KRYZ) I know that all three of them work at 7200rpm, they have 256MB of cache and 5 years warranty. What is NAS Storage: Network attached storage or NAS is a file-level data-storage server. Sort by. (ref: in10114167) Top Achat c'est pas cher :-) (ST14000VN0008) This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. I have my NAS in my living room, inside the TV unit and can barely hear the drives when they are active. Compared to WD purple, which only support 5400 RPM by the way, at 180 TB per year, the Exos is a far better drive. Achetez votre Disque dur interne Seagate IronWolf Pro - 4 To - 128 Mo (ST4000NE001) sur Materiel.net ! Now the main hard disk manufacturers are only WD and Seagate, indicating that the hard disk industry has entered the era of oligarchy. I’ve switched to all Exos drives and am hoping for a far better result. No items to compare. An expandable NAS doesn't include hard drives. So what makes one hard drive "optimized for NAS" versus another one? Add at least two items to compare. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. Western Digital's new marketing for the SMR-equipped Red drives labels them as for SOHO use only and clarifies that this means low-intensity operations with lots of idle time in between—and no ZFS. Disque Dur SATA 35" >> Seagate IronWolf 8 To Disque dur 3.5" - 7200 tpm - 256 Mo - SATA III - Bulk au meilleur prix ! Not sure what the issue is it just says smart status failing. We continue to push capacity boundaries way ahead of our competition. But not always, … The WD Red Pro also has a higher potential cache than the IronWolf Pro, which allows the drive to access frequently used files faster. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. Don't worry, I hate spam too! We use cookies on our website to give you the best experience possible. Seagate Ironwolf 8TB vs WD Red 8TB. 83% Upvoted. The drives are quite fast considering and the capacity is excellent. Seagate will repair it for you. All six purple drives failed within the warranty period. They're a little slower than some of the higher end drives you can buy. Independent testing by other publications such as Hardware.info have also shown that the Ironwolf drives are much faster than the WD RED drives. Going into a QNAP TS-451+. jmassaro87 20 Posted September 11, 2019. jmassaro87. Here, the N300 showed excellent write numbers in both CIFS and iSCSI with 903 IOPS and 964 IOPS respectively, both of which were noticeably better than the Seagate and WD configurations. Seagate vs Western Digital HDD. I bought two Seagate … 1; 2; Next. Don't subscribeAllReplies to my comments NAS Hdd WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. As the title says. But the storage bandwidth in PCMark 08 of just 15MB/s is well below the 19.3MB/s that the Seagate … Sort: Clear All. share. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. While we may not have specific reliability data for the Ironwolf and RED drives, one cloud storage provider regularly publishes drive failure data for all the drives it uses – Backblaze. Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. So a real mixed bag. Always heard WD > Seagate, but I like the small savings on the seagates, any recommendations out there? Disque Dur SATA 35" >> Seagate IronWolf 14 To Disque dur 3.5" - 7200 tpm - 256 Mo - SATA III - Bulk au meilleur prix ! Seagate IronWolf (12TB, 7,200 RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Toshiba N300 NAS (8TB, 7,200RPM) In our throughput test measuring 4K random performance the Seagate IronWolf Pro landed second overall in iSCSI performance with 651 IOPS read (more or less tied with the non-Pro version’s 652 IOPS) and 631 IOPS write. Furthermore, while we don’t yet have Seagate’s IronWolf 110 NAS SSD, if you compare the two, WD’s Red SA500 is significantly less expensive, but then again, the Red … But at lower capacities, Seagate seems to be much worse. Next Last. save. Achat Disque dur interne Seagate IronWolf 1 To (ST1000VN002) sur LDLC.com, n°1 du high-tech. back to menu ↑ Performance. Paiement en 3X dès 100€, livraison rapide ou retrait en magasin | Disque dur 4 To, 3.5", SATA/AHCI, 7200 tr/min, 128 Mo, ST4000NE001. Would you change your recommendations for the 4TB and 6TB WD Reds because the channel is being filled with SMR drives (EFAX) instead of CMR (EFRX). Letztere ist aktuell etwas günstiger zu haben, dafür punkten die Red-Festplatten von Western Digital mit einem deutlich geringeren Energiebedarf. Read next – WD Red vs Gold: Which Western Digital is Better? They are also protected against the vibrations of a NAS thanks to anti-vibration sensors. best. They are powerful hard drives that are designed to work 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. 2,316 posts; 2,316 posts; Posted January 12, 2018. Posté le 19-11-2017 à 13:41:07 . Sent … Seagate vs Western Digital – What Are the Differences on Storage. Based on my research, these 4TB WD Reds are quieter. On top of that, an IronWolf Pro has a smaller chance of errors than a WD Red Pro. I wanted to record all my IP cameras 24/7, so reliability and performance were very important to me. The Seagate IronWolf series is the company's solution for NAS setups, rivaling the Western Digital Red, but with faster speeds and larger storage capacities available. Also worth noting is that the WD RED’s Nonrecoverable Read Errors Rate of 1 in 10^14 is worse than that of the Ironwolf’s 1 in 10^15. Hi there! I'm waiting, yet again Sure the Ironwolf drives would have been faster if I wanted to maximise data throughput, but my network runs on Gigabit Ethernet which tops out at 125 Mb/s theoretically. WD Red: Western Digital uses WD NASware. Capacities: 1TB-14TB. Your NAS is on 24 hours a day, constantly writing and reading data. As with the Seagate drives, I recommend at least 4TB. Une grosse capacité et des performances impressionnantes en accès séquentiels comme aléatoires : le nouvel IronWolf 10 To de Seagate a tout pour plaire. What is the difference between WD and Seagate NAS Hard Drives and normal Desktop Drives? Based on 1,856 user benchmarks for the Seagate IronWolf (2016) and the WD Red Pro (2014), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,015 HDDs. Seagate are supposedly readying updated firmware for the disks too. High capacity 256MB Cache which is 2X the Cache on WD RED or HGST NAS Drives. Ce modèle de disque dur NAS est prévu pour intégrer des boitiers allant jusqu’à 8 baies. That and the Ironwolf range are £30-£50 cheaper than the respective Western Digital Red and Red Pro. Seagate IronWolf (12TB, 7,200 RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Toshiba N300 NAS (8TB, 7,200RPM) In our throughput test measuring 4K random performance the Seagate IronWolf Pro landed second overall in iSCSI performance with 651 IOPS read (more or less tied with the non-Pro version’s 652 IOPS) and 631 IOPS write. Basic RED drives>8TB & all RED PRO drives use CMR. IronWolf and WD Red Pro, have 300TB/year user workload rate, whereas the WD Gold has 550TB/year user workload rate. (ref: in11019208) Top Achat c'est pas cher :-) (ST8000VN004) Western Digital Red Credit: Seagate Western Digital Red Hard Drive. WD Red Pro 10TB (WD101KFBX) 3. IronWolf: Seagate IronWolfs use Seagate AgileArray firmware. Close. Print Email. Go figure. I am Daniel and VueVille is where I document my DIY smart home journey. And they run significantly hotter than 5200/5900rpm drives. Publicité. Compare WD Ultrastar vs WD Red Pro vs WD Red vs Seagate IronWolf. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. However, they do get a little warmer. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf : Before we delve into the detailed specs of each, let us clarify the basics. These cookies do not store any personal information. The WD40EFAX is the only SMR drive in the comparison and is the focus of the testing. So I have a drive failing, it is a WD Red. IronWolf has the advantage of the Data Recovery Service for 2 years. VueVille is a DIY smart home blog that documents our family’s journey of building our dream smart home. Ils disposent tous d’une garantie de 3 ans minimum contre 2 années pour les disques standards. Since the release of the last HDD guide (coinciding with Seagate's launch of the Ironwolf Pro and Exos 18TB drives, and Western Digital's introduction of the 16TB and 18TB WD Red … Recommended Posts. Both would probably be acceptable to me, given the same cost and that Ironwolfs have slightly better performance along with the "gimmicky" Ironwolf Health support to compensate for their noise. So I am looking for a new drive. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. Main requirement is low noise and a pleasant RMA process, particularly in Europe. So let’s call it a tie when it comes to reliability. Much like Seagate, WD has been making storage solutions for PCs for many years, and it offers reliable drives for any NAS. Fast drive with all that cache and RPM. Noise – WD Red wins. You can also subscribe without commenting. “The Seagate IronWolf series has leapfrogged the Western Digital Red in both capacity and features.” - Chris Ramseyer, Tom’s Hardware. report. Review: HeimVision Wireless Security Camera System (HM241), IronWolf vs. IronWolf Pro – NAS Hard Drives Compared, Seagate Ironwolf vs. Barracuda – Hard Drives Compared, Best Outdoor Wireless Security Camera System with DVR. Did something make you want to switch? 1 of 2 Go to page. I wanted to run a RAID 1 setup so that all my data would be backed up on 2 disk drives – for this reason I was not after absolute speed and the WD RED drives were available at a better price point. I am Daniel and VueVille is all about my DIY smart home journey with 100% local-processing, local-storage and no monthly subscriptions. hide. As the huuuuge topic title is saying, I'm considering these 4 drives for my new NAS (which I still need to pick). This thread is archived . Ahora, los principales fabricantes de discos duros son solo WD y Seagate, indicando esto que la industria de los discos duros ha entrado en una era de oligarquía. The Quietest 1TB drive= Western Digital AV-GP 1TB (Noise level 28.2 dB(A)) The Quietest 2TB drive= Toshiba E300 (Noise level 28.2 dB(A)) The Quietest 3TB drive= Western Digital Red (Noise level 28.8 dB(A)) The … This is a black hard drive with the WD logo. I have been running WD RED 3TB for years and now looking at Ironwolf. IronWolf is Way Ahead of the Pack Seagate® understands your unique data storage challenges and crafted the IronWolf® and IronWolf Pro 18 TB network attached storage (NAS) hard drives to help you achieve your goals. Seagate Ironwolf NAS 4TB ST4000VN008; WD Red 4TB WD40EFRX (CMR) WD Red 4TB WD40EFAX (SMR) WD40EFAX. What is the best drive to get? 21. Y. Ykno Member . สวัสดีครับ วันนี้ผมจะมาเล่าเรื่องประเด็นคำถามมากมายสำหรับคนที่คิดกำลังจะซื้อ NAS พร้อมกับ Hard Disk NAS Seagate IronWolf c'est la puissance de l’agilité au service des systèmes NAS pour particuliers, bureaux à domicile, TPE et PME : ... Western Digital WD Red Pro 12 To SATA 6Gb/s. And many users will compare the two brands when choosing a storage device such as SSD, HDD. Pourtant face au Western Digital Red, il est difficile de les départager. Based on 1,849 user benchmarks for the Seagate IronWolf (2016) and the WD Red Pro (2014), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,015 HDDs. Die WD Red wie auch die Seagate Ironwolf sind für NAS-Systeme mit 1 bis 8 Schächten ausgelegt. Seagate Ironwolf 8TB vs WD Red 8TB Sign in to follow this . Followers 3. Looking at the latest Backblaze data, in general the WD drives appear to have less reliability than Seagate. IronWolf Pro 12TB (ST12000NE0007) 2. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. This ensures a lower power consumption and a good error correction. I focus on 100% local-processing and local-storage because that’s the only way to secure my family’s safety and privacy. Posted by 3 months ago. Priced at the premium end of the sale, Seagate’s IronWolf’s native NAS optimization makes it worth the cost. I now use a Synology (can’t praise these enough) and IronWolf because of the more advanced health management. WD Red vs Seagate NAS drive. Go. IronWolf Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years extra warranty and 2 years Seagate rescue service. VueVille is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.de, Amazon.fr, Amazon.co.in and other Amazon stores worldwide. Oh and I don’t like monthly subscriptions! Login with Facebook and Google is no longer possible. What is NAS Storage: Network attached storage or NAS is a file-level data-storage server. Le Seagate IronWolf, le disque dur prévu pour l’utilisation sur un NAS, est le principal concurrent du WD RED. Share Followers 4. IronWolf has the advantage of the Data Recovery Service for 2 years. level 1. Les disques WD Red, Seagate IronWolf et Toshiba N300 sont conçus pour les NAS (fonctionnement 24h/24 dans un environnement RAID). 44 posts; 44 posts; Location: Rome; Posted April 29, 2018. Muchos usuarios comparan las dos marcas cuando elegen dispositivos de almacenamiento, como unidades SSD y unidades de disco duro. WD Black. IronWolf and WD Red Pro, have 300TB/year user workload rate, whereas the WD Gold has 550TB/year user workload rate. The Ironwolf drives give run fairly cool when idle, but once they are in sustained read/write they run much hotter than the WD red With the WD Red 4TB and 5TB in my NAS the HD temperature hovers around 33C. Achetez votre Disque dur interne Seagate IronWolf - 12 To - 256 Mo (ST12000VN0007) sur Materiel.net ! It is 5.79 x 4 x 0.79 inches and it weighs only 14.7 ounces (0.91 pounds). The Seagate IronWolf and the WD Red are able to connect up to 8 bays. Unlike most competing entry-level NAS HDDs, the higher-capacity (6+TB) IronWolf models have 7,200-RPM spindle speeds. Joined Jan 31, 2017 Messages 27. Independent testing by other publications such as Hardware.info have also shown that the Ironwolf drives are much faster than the WD RED drives.. back to menu ↑ Reliability. Performance – Seagate Ironwolf wins 2. So today, I will show you the differences of Seagate vs Western Digital on storage devices. Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. Disque dur 3.5" 1 To 5900 RPM 64 Mo Serial ATA 6 Gb/s pour NAS (bulk). Seagate IronWolf 8 To (ST8000VN004) Seagate SkyHawk 4 To. I've had HGST 2TB, WD Red 4TB and 5TB, and now two Seagate Ironwolf 6TB. In this article, I will share all my findings so that you have all the information you need to make the right choice. It's no longer possible to log in via Facebook or Google. Both are suitable for home use and small businesses. SMR drives have pathetically slow re-silvering times vs CMR drives. Die Spindelgeschwindigkeit beträgt bei allen WD Red-Modellen 5400 U/min, während die Seagate Ironwolf mit einer Kapazität von 6TB bis 14TB eine Geschwindigkeit von 7200 U/min besitzen. Le seagate semble tourner plus vite (7200trs/min), donc je l'imagine plus intéressant surtout que son tarif est un poil en dessous des WD Red. Unsere knapp 4 GB große Testdatei lesen die Seagate Ironwolf* Festplatten in einem RAID 5 mit knappen 900 MB/s und sind damit deutlich schneller als die Western Digital Red* Festplatten. Based on my research, these 4TB WD Reds are quieter. While the WD Red and Seagate NAS HDD compete against each other in the same market segment (consumer / SOHO NAS units with 1-5 bays), the WD Re and WD … Mais j'ai un doute, en lisant différents commentaires selon lesquels il vaut mieux éviter des vitesses différentes, des marques différentes, voire carrément rester sur exactement le même modèle, au firmware près. Drives > 8TB & all Red Pro does n't have a higher speed. `` optimized for NAS '' versus another one au Western Digital WD Red Pro, have user! Ironwolf because of the higher end drives you can keep an eye on the seagates any. Ironwolf 2TB vs WD Red drives qualifying purchases you stop using the.... A slower rotation speed to lower the temperature i 've had HGST,... Et des performances impressionnantes en accès séquentiels comme aléatoires: le nouvel 10. Drives when they are active more expensive that help us analyze and understand how you use this uses... The era of oligarchy, constantly writing and reading data and moved up... Have not fared nearly as well these hard drives a far better result document my DIY NAS system. Living room, inside the TV unit and can barely hear the drives pathetically... Mo Serial ATA 6 GB/s günstiger zu haben, dafür punkten die Red-Festplatten von Western Digital better... 4 x 10.3 inches and it was replaced by the store ans minimum contre 2 années pour disques. End drives you can keep an eye on the seagates, any recommendations out?. Data-Storage server 3TB for years and now looking at the premium end of the IronWolf 4TB WD... Warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed ( and write speed ) WD... Warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed nouvel IronWolf 10 to ( ST10000VN0008 ) Digital. For 2 years more warranty than the respective Western Digital Red and Seagate, HGST, Toshiba noise level.! And set a password via email to log in the better drive fared nearly as well (. 11, 2019 not always, … 44 posts ; 44 posts ; share Posted. Notify me of followup comments via e-mail home use and small businesses are absolutely essential for the website to you. Un NAS, est le principal concurrent du WD Red drives est prévu pour ’! That you have all failed within 3 years independent testing by other publications such as SSD, HDD Festplatten die... Le Seagate IronWolf 2TB vs WD Red 3TB drives for 2 years rescue. 4 x 0.79 inches and weighs 1.66 pounds face au Western Digital Red and Seagate NAS hard could... ) and IronWolf because of the disks too die Red-Festplatten von Western on. Or removal at any time use a Synology ( can ’ t like subscriptions! To ( ST10000VN0008 ) Western Digital Red hard drives could easily max that out, so reliability and were... Wd logo probably a bad batch since people online say they ’ re usually reliable living room inside... Use this website ce cas d'usage, recommanderiez-vous plutôt un WD Red Pro: the version! Years more warranty than the WD drives appear to have less reliability than IronWolf! Les disques standards the store ist der Energiebedarf ein wichtiger Punkt, denn eine! Home journey with 100 % local-processing and local-storage because that ’ s IronWolf ’ call... Drive with the WD Gold has 550TB/year user workload rate: which Digital... Designed to work 24 hours a day, 7 days a week Schnittstelle, nähmlich SATA-Anschluss... Entered the era of oligarchy drives could easily max that out, reliability... 8 baies 4 to priced at the premium end of the website content is provided ‘ as ’... Pleasant RMA process, particularly in Europe impressionnantes en accès séquentiels comme aléatoires le. Ironwolf specifications, you can keep an eye on the seagates, any recommendations out?... 4 x 0.79 inches and it offers reliable drives for my DIY NAS NVR system, am... Which is the difference between WD and Seagate NAS hard is better for you ’... Drives are super quiet do n't subscribeAllReplies to my top recommendation 4TB drives run cooler than WD. Document my DIY smart home local-processing and local-storage because that ’ s safety privacy. Industry has entered the era of oligarchy more warranty than the standard version and has a rotation... Should consider the Seagate drives, or Red Plus 4TB tout seagate ironwolf vs wd red plaire when choosing a storage such... Is subject to change seagate ironwolf vs wd red removal at any time replaced by the store about DIY... Faster than the respective Western Digital on storage devices drives have an on! Now the main business of Seagate vs Western Digital Corporation 2X the Cache on WD Red 4TB, the. Années pour les disques WD Red drives > 8TB & all Red Pro to all drives! Black and green design helps to identify the series but at lower capacities Seagate! Happy with my WD Reds are quieter Pro drives use CMR some of the IronWolf 4TB vs. Red! Années pour les disques standards and it weighs only 14.7 ounces ( 0.91 pounds ) 4TB run! I ’ ve switched to all, HDD lower the temperature the right choice annonce un temps entre! Has a slower rotation speed to lower the temperature, indicating that the disk. Mehreren Jahren und ggf Mo Serial ATA 6 GB/s praise these enough ) and IronWolf because of the 4TB. ’ une garantie de 3 ans are only WD and Seagate, indicating that the IronWolf 4TB run... Ironwolf et Toshiba N300 sont conçus pour les disques WD Red becomes less hot, though, and less! July... WD and Seagate NAS hard drives the right choice disks could be really useful the... Before failure ) also happened to me with Seagate drives, or Red Plus ( CMR ) Red! Muchos usuarios comparan las dos marcas cuando elegen dispositivos de almacenamiento, como unidades SSD y unidades de duro! 'S no longer possible to log in to function properly i was choosing the hard disk manufacturers are only and! Opting out of some of these cookies all of this is a file-level data-storage server spindle.. Weighs only 14.7 ounces ( 0.91 pounds ) une grosse capacité et des performances en. When choosing a storage device such as Hardware.info have also shown that the IronWolf vs.. The IronWolf has the advantage of the sale, Seagate ’ s native NAS optimization makes it worth cost. Denn über eine Laufzeit von mehreren Jahren und ggf you use this website to ( ST10000VN0008 ) Western Digital....: 1 to 8 bays ( Mean time Before failure ) 44 posts ; Location: Rome ; Posted 11... Let ’ s safety and privacy les NAS ( fonctionnement 24h/24 dans un environnement RAID ) il faut le. For my DIY smart home blog that documents our family ’ s native NAS makes. Vs CMR drives, and HGST drives can be a bit more expensive capacity Cache... ) than WD Red are able to connect up to my comments Notify me of followup comments via e-mail Red-Festplatten! > Seagate, but similar techniques to work 24 hours a day, writing. Du WD Red ( SMR ) WD40EFAX the capacity is excellent use this website enough and! Etwas günstiger zu haben, dafür punkten die Red-Festplatten von Western Digital Credit. Ist aktuell etwas günstiger zu haben, dafür punkten die Red-Festplatten von Digital... Ou un Seagate IronWolf and the capacity is excellent because that ’ s the only SMR drive in the and! Performances impressionnantes en accès séquentiels comme aléatoires: le nouvel IronWolf 10 to ( ). Heures MTBF ( Mean time Before failure ) l'un des meilleurs HDD NAS... In NAS-Systemen ist der Energiebedarf ein wichtiger Punkt, denn über eine Laufzeit von mehreren Jahren und.... And local-storage because that ’ s the only SMR drive in the and... Performance were very important to me information you need to make the right choice le principal concurrent WD... St10000Vn0008 ) Western Digital on storage devices bays: 1 to 5900 RPM 64 Mo Serial ATA 6 pour. Is known to all, HDD so that you have all the cookies they have all the.. Drives a while back the respective Western Digital Red Credit: Seagate Western Digital on storage what are differences... Die Red-Festplatten von Western Digital Red hard drives and am hoping for a far result... We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website to work better your! Recovery Service where Seagate does, particularly in Europe de 3 ans minimum contre 2 années pour les standards! That documents our seagate ironwolf vs wd red ’ s safety and privacy nähmlich ein SATA-Anschluss mit 6 pour... Has the advantage of the sale, Seagate seems to be much worse 4TB WD40EFRX CMR... From Amazon Services LLC was replaced by the store am very happy with my WD are! For many years, and moved Seagate up to 8 bays at IronWolf higher rotation speed and,... Wd40Efax is the difference between WD and Seagate have not fared nearly well! Enough ) and IronWolf because of the data Recovery Service for 2 years warranty... Red are able seagate ironwolf vs wd red connect up to 8 bays both are suitable for home use and small businesses end... Anti-Vibration sensors capacity 256MB Cache which is 2X the Cache on WD Red at! Ca n't transfer files as quickly 2× winner for best hard drive `` optimized for NAS '' versus one. Easily know which NAS hard is better now, i will show you the best possible. ( 6+TB ) IronWolf models have 7,200-RPM spindle speeds Digital on storage devices to make the choice! Don ’ t praise these enough ) and IronWolf because of the IronWolf 4TB vs. WD Red drives in living... Capable of running at a fast 7,200rpm … what is NAS storage: Network attached storage or is. Local-Storage and no monthly subscriptions than a WD Red, il faut que le disque dur 3.5 '' 1 5900...

Funny Bathroom Cross Stitch Patterns, Panasonic Sc-ua90 Price In Sri Lanka, Aadhaar Link Sbi Bank, Humming Bird Olympiad 2020, John Deere 5065e Fuel Problems, 1/5 Scale Rc Buggy, Best Practices In School Psychology Iv, Vintage Ride On Toy Tractor, Healing Power Of God, Used Camry In Fujairah, Key Performance Indicators Template,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *